The "moral advantage" of the left is a great lie - Article by the Leader of Golden Dawn N.G. Michaloliakos

23/10/2016 16:03

The “moral advantage” of the left is a great lie-Article of N. G. Michaloliakos

The usual slogan of the left propaganda is the famous “moral advantage” of the left wing, meaning the false claim that during the 42 years since the change of the regime, the left wing had no involvement in scandals, in the robbery of the public wealth, in cronyism!

 

And these were the main points of the speech of the chairman of SYRIZA in the Greek Parliament, regarding the interdependence and the corruption. I responded, yet there was no reply…I also reported the following, relevant to the series of scandals: 

 

The Prime Minister stated that: “We are not all the same”. Indeed we are not. At this point, I’d like to remind the statement of Mr. Voutsis, the President of the Hellenic Parliament, at the conference of KEDKE, of the Central Association of Towns and Municipalities. “We‘d better not refer to scandals, because Golden Dawn will be the only beneficed”. In the Parliament, the President was also present, yet he did not make any declaration, regarding this issue. What else, however, he could declare? Would he refuse his own statement?

 

The main issue of the debate in the Parliament was the interdependence and the channels. I gave a speech about these affairs, where I exposed the complicity of the left wing in this corrupt regime. Of course, I got no answers.

 

I specifically noted: “When did the television station broadcast for the first time? Everything started in the end of 1989. Notably, the television station “MEGA” commenced to broadcast at the 20th of November 1989, while the television station “ANTENNA” at 31st of December 1989. These stations started to broadcast after the elections of the 5th of November 1989, when in 23rd of November was formed the Government of Zolotas. It was a government formed by New Democracy, PASOK, Synaspismos, in which KKE and EAR –it could be characterized as the political predecessor of SYRIZA - also took part. So, the Left is also accountable for this “sinful” regime of television licenses, for the interdependence that debuted along with the creation of these television stations, for the SIEMENS affair…Well, the channels, as well as this non-liability regime and the case of SIEMENS are the outcome of the policies of New Democracy and PASOK, but also of the left side. At the times of the All-Party-Government was signed the first agreement with SIEMENS, with the accordance of the Left side.”

 

Not a single word from SYRIZA, concerning the broadcast of television stations at the era of the All-Party-Government, the founding of channels without a license, for the agreement with SIEMENS…

 

We also gave answers about the finances of the political parties, a subject where SYRIZA has no moral advantage, as well. Nor does KKE, which recently sold his own television station for 6 million euros to an off-shore company. Regarding SYRIZA, I specified that: “Mr. Prime Minister reported the suspicious loans of New Democracy. However, SYRIZA has also taken loans, in a lower scale though. As I clarified, there is a difference in quantity, not in quality. Only in 2015, “Avgi” received 550.000 euros from bank publicity. A newspaper that can barely lance about thousand copies! Well, why the bankers offered 550.000 euros? Do their customers demand information for their banking transactions by the newspaper “Avgi”? Of course not. Additionally, as stated by the representative of “Avgi” in the Investigation Commission, 2% of the shares of “Avgi”, 16.500 shares, having a value of 100.000 euros, belong to an off-shore, which remains unknown.

 

Also, this newspaper, since we refer to suspicious loans, took a loan of more than one million euros, with SYRIZA as guarantor. The loans of SYRIZA surpass the 8 million euros. In 2010, Synaspismos demanded from the National Bank a settlement of liabilities of 6, 6 million euros and a new loan of 1, 5 million. In fact, he offered as guarantee the building in Koumoundourou Square. A building whose value is insignificant, considering the immense degradation of the center of Athens.”

 

So, the so called moral advantage of the Left side is a great lie, since the left has been involved all these years in the affairs of the Towns and the Municipalities, in the founding of cooperatives with false grants, but also in suspicious loans.

 

Us, the members and the adherent at Golden Dawn, we are the only ones who indeed have this moral advantage, because our party never received a loan form a bank, nor does it owe a single euro to a bank. Our political party never administrated public wealth, whether in governance, in a Town or a Municipality. 

 

N. G. Michaloliakos

Secretary General of People’s Association-Golden Dawn

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: xryshaygh.com

The usual slogan of the left propaganda is the famous “moral advantage” of the left wing, meaning the false claim that during the 42 years since the change of the regime, the left wing had no involvement in scandals, in the robbery of the public wealth, in cronyism!
And these were the main points of the speech of the chairman of SYRIZA in the Greek Parliament, regarding the interdependence and the corruption. I responded, yet there was no reply…I also reported the following, relevant to the series of scandals: 
The Prime Minister stated that: “We are not all the same”. Indeed we are not. At this point, I’d like to remind the statement of Mr. Voutsis, the President of the Hellenic Parliament, at the conference of KEDKE, of the Central Association of Towns and Municipalities. “We‘d better not refer to scandals, because Golden Dawn will be the only beneficed”. In the Parliament, the President was also present, yet he did not make any declaration, regarding this issue. What else, however, he could declare? Would he refuse his own statement?
The main issue of the debate in the Parliament was the interdependence and the channels. I gave a speech about these affairs, where I exposed the complicity of the left wing in this corrupt regime. Of course, I got no answers.
I specifically noted: “When did the television station broadcast for the first time? Everything started in the end of 1989. Notably, the television station “MEGA” commenced to broadcast at the 20th of November 1989, while the television station “ANTENNA” at 31st of December 1989. These stations started to broadcast after the elections of the 5th of November 1989, when in 23rd of November was formed the Government of Zolotas. It was a government formed by New Democracy, PASOK, Synaspismos, in which KKE and EAR –it could be characterized as the political predecessor of SYRIZA - also took part. So, the Left is also accountable for this “sinful” regime of television licenses, for the interdependence that debuted along with the creation of these television stations, for the SIEMENS affair…Well, the channels, as well as this non-liability regime and the case of SIEMENS are the outcome of the policies of New Democracy and PASOK, but also of the left side. At the times of the All-Party-Government was signed the first agreement with SIEMENS, with the accordance of the Left side.”
Not a single word from SYRIZA, concerning the broadcast of television stations at the era of the All-Party-Government, the founding of channels without a license, for the agreement with SIEMENS…
We also gave answers about the finances of the political parties, a subject where SYRIZA has no moral advantage, as well. Nor does KKE, which recently sold his own television station for 6 million euros to an off-shore company. Regarding SYRIZA, I specified that: “Mr. Prime Minister reported the suspicious loans of New Democracy. However, SYRIZA has also taken loans, in a lower scale though. As I clarified, there is a difference in quantity, not in quality. Only in 2015, “Avgi” received 550.000 euros from bank publicity. A newspaper that can barely lance about thousand copies! Well, why the bankers offered 550.000 euros? Do their customers demand information for their banking transactions by the newspaper “Avgi”? Of course not. Additionally, as stated by the representative of “Avgi” in the Investigation Commission, 2% of the shares of “Avgi”, 16.500 shares, having a value of 100.000 euros, belong to an off-shore, which remains unknown.
Also, this newspaper, since we refer to suspicious loans, took a loan of more than one million euros, with SYRIZA as guarantor. The loans of SYRIZA surpass the 8 million euros. In 2010, Synaspismos demanded from the National Bank a settlement of liabilities of 6, 6 million euros and a new loan of 1, 5 million. In fact, he offered as guarantee the building in Koumoundourou Square. A building whose value is insignificant, considering the immense degradation of the center of Athens.”
Well, the so called moral advantage of the Left side is a great lie, since the left has been involved all these years in the affairs of the Towns and the Municipalities, in the founding of cooperatives with false grants, but also in suspicious loans.
Us, the members and the adherent at Golden Dawn, we are the only ones who indeed have this moral advantage, because our party never received a loan form a bank, nor does it owe a single euro to a bank. Our political party never administrated public wealth, whether in governance, in a Town or a Municipality. 
N. G. Michaloliakos
Secretary General of People’s Association-Golden Dawn
Back