The real motives of the protests against the ban of the entry of islamists at USA

04/02/2017 17:20

The real motives of the protests against the ban of the entry of islamists at USA

In many cities of America but also in capitals of Europe, thousands of demonstrators are protesting the last days against the resolution regarding the entry of muslims at USA from specific countries. According to the claims of the demonstrators, they make these protests due to their sympathy towards the muslim immigrants and refugees who have been caged by the order of the White house and are not able to travel to USA. The deputy attorney general Sally Yates, who tried to slide over the order of Trump was immediately fired, a fact that indicates the determination of the government concerning this major and crucial issue of the internal security of USA.

 

The opposition protests against the recently elected President were also provoked by the fact that Trump made a radical reformation of the composition of the National Security Council (NSC), by signing an order according to which the composition of this specific supreme instrument will also include the consultant of the president regarding the military affairs Stephen Bannon, who is a famous nationalist and patriot and the instigator of the policy “America First”.

 

The known for their dependence on zionists medias of USA and Europe, but also many leaders of states, prompted by the previous resolutions of Trump assaulted against him, accusing him of “anti-Americanism” and “fascism”. The motives, however, of the demonstrators and the medias regarding the installation at USA of muslim immigrants or refugees are suspicious, since there are no feelings of sympathy for them. The medias, the motivated demonstrators, Merkel, Hollande, Trudeau do not accuse Trump because they are concerned about the “democratic” rights of the muslim immigrants and refugees. In any case, they are the instigators and they are accomplices of the policies that produced the greatest migratory crisis after World War II, they are accomplices of the war crimes in Middle Asia, Northern Africa, Central Asia. 

 

The hypocritical and pretentious protests of them all derive from the fact that Trump, with the order about the banning of the entry of muslims, mines the imperialistic crusade of the zionist establishment  of Washington, mines the global regal aspirations of the international zionism and undercuts the military operations of USA at Middle Asia, Northern Africa and Central Asia, which procured great profits to the zionist, military and industrial complex of USA.

 

All those protesting cynically against the Trump policy, have blood in their hands, the blood of million thousands of non-combatants, refugees and immigrants. For 25 years following the devastation of the Soviet Union, these governments –voted by the current demonstrators and protestors- destabilized countries and killed non-combatants, aiming to a global hegemony and using the military machine of USA and NATO. There are countries like Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen that were devastated and their residents became immigrants and refugees. 

 

We remind to all those hypocrites and followers of the Globalization that the new president of USA has instigated no war against another country and that his policy called “America First” does not constitute a declaration of war or a destabilizing aggression against a foreign state. The zionists oligarchy of Washington and their puppets in Europe will definitely do anything in order to obstruct Trump from applying his national and patriotic policy. 

 

Yet, those who follow or trust them or desire to participate at this motivated crusade against Trump ought to propose the alternative solution. Why are they against the proposed by Trump engagement with Russia? Why they do not want peace in Middle Asia? What is their problem concerning the economic patriotism of the new president? Why should USA become filled with muslim immigrant, while the unemployment is high in this country and the debt arrives at 19 trillion dollars? What is their objections regarding the dissolution of NATO, of an allegedly defensive mechanism with no reason of extinction? Why do they defend E.U., a supranational organization that augmented the poverty of poor and reversely augments the riches of the oligarchy? 

 

G. Linardis

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: xryshaygh.com

In many cities of America but also in capitals of Europe, thousands of demonstrators are protesting the last days against the resolution regarding the entry of muslims at USA from specific countries. According to the claims of the demonstrators, they make these protests due to their sympathy towards the muslim immigrants and refugees who have been caged by the order of the White house and are not able to travel to USA. The deputy attorney general Sally Yates, who tried to slide over the order of Trump was immediately fired, a fact that indicates the determination of the government concerning this major and crucial issue of the internal security of USA.
The opposition protests against the recently elected President were also provoked by the fact that Trump made a radical reformation of the composition of the National Security Council (NSC), by signing an order according to which the composition of this specific supreme instrument will also include the consultant of the president regarding the military affairs Stephen Bannon, who is a famous nationalist and patriot and the instigator of the policy “America First”.
The known for their dependence on zionists medias of USA and Europe, but also many leaders of states, prompted by the previous resolutions of Trump assaulted against him, accusing him of “anti-Americanism” and “fascism”. The motives, however, of the demonstrators and the medias regarding the installation at USA of muslim immigrants or refugees are suspicious, since there are no feelings of sympathy for them. The medias, the motivated demonstrators, Merkel, Hollande, Trudeau do not accuse Trump because they are concerned about the “democratic” rights of the muslim immigrants and refugees. In any case, they are the instigators and they are accomplices of the policies that produced the greatest migratory crisis after World War II, they are accomplices of the war crimes in Middle Asia, Northern Africa, Central Asia. 
The hypocritical and pretentious protests of them all derive from the fact that Trump, with the order about the banning of the entry of muslims, mines the imperialistic crusade of the zionist establishment  of Washington, mines the global regal aspirations of the international zionism and undercuts the military operations of USA at Middle Asia, Northern Africa and Central Asia, which procured great profits to the zionist, military and industrial complex of USA.
All those protesting cynically against the Trump policy, have blood in their hands, the blood of million thousands of non-combatants, refugees and immigrants. For 25 years following the devastation of the Soviet Union, these governments –voted by the current demonstrators and protestors- destabilized countries and killed non-combatants, aiming to a global hegemony and using the military machine of USA and NATO. There are countries like Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen that were devastated and their residents became immigrants and refugees. 
We remind to all those hypocrites and followers of the Globalization that the new president of USA has instigated no war against another country and that his policy called “America First” does not constitute a declaration of war or a destabilizing aggression against a foreign state. The zionists oligarchy of Washington and their puppets in Europe will definitely do anything in order to obstruct Trump from applying his national and patriotic policy. 
Yet, those who follow or trust them or desire to participate at this motivated crusade against Trump ought to propose the alternative solution. Why are they against the proposed by Trump engagement with Russia? Why they do not want peace in Middle Asia? What is their problem concerning the economic patriotism of the new president? Why should USA become filled with muslim immigrant, while the unemployment is high in this country and the debt arrives at 19 trillion dollars? What is their objections regarding the dissolution of NATO, of an allegedly defensive mechanism with no reason of extinction? Why do they defend E.U., a supranational organization that augmented the poverty of poor and reversely augments the riches of the oligarchy? 
G. Linardis
Back